Category: Noodlesoft


Hazel 3.0 beta

September 12th, 2011 — 12:07pm

After all the delays, dead ends, procrastination, wool gathering, futzing around and some actual hard work, Hazel 3 is finally open for beta testing. There’s no set duration for the beta period; it ships when it’s done.

If you’re feeling lucky, you can get the details from this forum article (you need to register for a forum account if you haven’t already). By the way, I hear Time Machine is pretty cool.

 

1 comment » | Business, Downloads, Hazel, Noodlesoft, OS X, Software

Hazel is 5!

September 5th, 2011 — 11:02pm

Five years ago today, I shipped Hazel 1.0.

Hazel started as a personal project that I wrote for my own use but over time I realized that this might be useful to others. Sometimes you just have to dive in. I quit my job to work on Hazel full-time and some months later, I finally shipped my 1.0. Sales were modest at first but over the years it’s paid off. It was a lot of work but it was worth it. If anything, I’ve clocked in more hours over the past few years working pantsless in my home office than over my entire career previous in various other offices.

This blog has been quiet for a while mainly because I’m still at it. Hazel 3 is nearing the testing stage (expect a beta release and more details soon). It’s a bit overdue; I was hoping to release before Duke Nukem Forever but then again, they had bit of a head start. With each new version, I feel like Hazel is fulfilling the vision I had when I first released it five years ago, and then some. Of course, I could never predict the new and interesting ways you have used Hazel over the years and hopefully you, the users, will help shape the product for many years to come.

Enough about the future. It’s Hazel’s birthday today and in celebration, you can get 20% off until midnight tonight (Tues, Sep. 6, Eastern time). Just use this link. Most of you reading this probably have a copy already but I’m sure you have a friend/relative/corporation with deep pockets that could use a copy (or twenty) so send the link along to them. Or buy an extra copy for yourself because you’re just crazy like that. And while you’re at it, have a drink on Hazel’s behalf, or even better, have a drink (or five) before you hit that order page. I hear you save more money have more fun that way.

8 comments » | Business, Hazel, Noodlesoft, Software

Adventures in Email Hosting

December 17th, 2009 — 12:06pm

As I’ve mentioned before, Noodlesoft’s online operations are happily hosted on Slicehost. A while back, I migrated my site and databases from DreamHost to Slicehost and haven’t looked back. Ok, well, not exactly. I didn’t migrate my email hosting over. There were several reasons for this:

  • Setting up and maintaining email software with all the features you want is a bit of a pain.
  • I wanted redundant MX servers. Getting another slice to do that is a bit costly.
  • I didn’t want email service to go down with my web site.

For the time being I left email on DreamHost. It’s a hard habit to kick. They provide tons of bandwidth and disk space for cheap. Of course, given enough time, DreamHost will disappoint you and disappoint they did. They changed the MX servers on me without notifying me. Since I have my DNS hosted elsewhere, I need to be warned ahead of time so I can do the proper DNS change. Not only that, there didn’t seem to be an overlap so mail going to the old MX was being bounced. Not acceptable. It was at this point I decided to get all my business operations off of DreamHost. It only drilled the point home when DreamHost would sporadically fail to resolve some mail aliases for a while afterwards.

What was I looking for in an email hosting provider? Several things:

  1. Reliability. This is where DreamHost seems to falter time and time again. With DreamHost, not only do things seem to go wrong more often, but their handling of the situation is unprofessional.
  2. Easy migration. This seems to be a bit more commonplace now. Providers now have a way where you can point their server at yours and have it suck out all the mail and folders. Even better if you can do it incrementally after the initial run to catch the extra emails that end up going to your old MX during the DNS transition.
  3. Support. I expect support to be accessible, responsive, competent and diligent. This is one of those times where I want to pay. With free, you have no leverage to get them to fix a problem in a timely fashion. This is my business here and I can’t afford to have unresponsive and unhelpful support if the service goes down.
  4. Features. This will be different for everyone but for me, I just need basic things like SSL for inbound (IMAP) and outbound (SMTP) and server-side rules/filtering.
  5. Reasonable resource limits. Some providers limit your bandwidth (both inbound and outbound) and all put limits on disk storage. The limits should be high enough that I don’t notice them.

Google Apps is an obvious choice but frankly, I don’t like how Gmail does IMAP. In addition, I was very unimpressed with Google’s support with Google Checkout and expected the same type of thing with their other services. See point 3 above.

I decided to try FuseMail. I heard some good things about them and pre-sales support was responsive so I signed up for a trial. Unfortunately, it didn’t work out. There were some odd problems here and there but ultimately it was because of unspoken usage limits. They flagged my account when I tried to do a full IMAP sync to my desktop mail client. Their claim was that I was using too many connections and suggested I should set Apple Mail to not download all messages. They violated point 5 in my list so I cancelled my account. Also, while their support was responsive, they weren’t actually always helpful. They seemed to be oriented towards getting a response out quickly instead of actually solving my problem.

I considered FastMail. Poking around on their site, it seemed to be a good fit for features but it felt like they were trying very hard to discourage you from contacting them. Even if you have a ticket system in place, not everyone that needs to talk to you is already a customer. I was turned off by their support pages and put them on the backburner.

I then poked around the Slicehost forums seeing what other people may be using. I discovered that Slicehost has a special deal with Rackspace (who own Slicehost now). I went to their site and was able to have actually useful conversations with sales and support people. I started my trial.

The migration seemed to go smoothly, albeit a bit slower than Fusemail’s migration tool. After the migration was done, I found a problem: all the dates on my messages were set to the migration date and not the actual original date received. After contacting support, I learned that their tool was resetting the IMAP INTERNALDATE which Apple Mail uses as “Date Received” (most other clients use the sent date in the mail header). After some tests with them, they finally fixed the problem internally. They performed a special migration for me and then I pointed my DNS at Rackspace’s servers. It’s unclear to me if/when this fix will get into the main migration tool; if you are considering signing up with them, I suggest contacting their support and asking first.

The verdict: I’m quite satisfied. After the setup hump, things seem to be running smoothly plus the Rackspace servers seem noticeably faster than DreamHost. A recent DreamHost-wide outage made me feel like I jumped ship just in time. I’ll probably keep my DreamHost account around in the short term for some random personal projects (which are expendable) but I’m glad that no part of my business is hosted with them anymore.

• • •

And before I go, I thought I’d share a procedure for those looking to migrate mail servers. Unfortunately, some of these points I came up with after a screw up or two on my part but now you get to benefit from my mistakes:

  1. If you are hosting DNS, turn down the TTL on your MX records. The TTL (time to live) is an indicator as to how long clients can cache this record. You want to turn it down so that when you switch to the new server, the cache won’t be stale for as long.
  2. On your new server, set up all accounts.
  3. On your new server, set up all aliases. Make sure they point to a valid address.
  4. On your new server, if the option is available, set up a catch-all address. This address will receive emails that are addressed to non-existent mailboxes/aliases. If possible, route it to a folder or account that is not used for anything else. Even if you don’t want this on normally, turn it on now until you are sure that all mailboxes and aliases are set up properly.
  5. Test locally. Check with your provider but some should shunt local mail without going to an external MX server (so you can do this before switching DNS). Make sure none of your aliases bounce.
  6. Do the migration. Depending on the size of your mailboxes, this may take some time (letting it run overnight is a good idea). Make sure to verify afterwards. Remember to check those dates!
  7. Update your MX records to point to the new server(s).
  8. When you feel comfortable that things are working ok on the new server, do a final migration to pick up any messages that arrived during the overlap period.
  9. Cancel old account.
  10. Pour yourself a scotch.

Note that steps #1-9 are optional.

Update (Dec. 18, 2009): Oh the irony. A day after I posted this, Rackspace had an outage. One the email hosting side, it seemed to only affect clients connecting to access their accounts. Their mail servers were still able to accept messages during this time which was the more important thing for me. Of course, I’d prefer stuff like this not to happen and time will tell how often it does happen. In the end, it was handled well and support was very quick to answer my follow-up questions after things settled down.

Comment » | Noodlesoft, System Administration

Hazel 2.3 is out

July 13th, 2009 — 1:16pm

Seems like forever since I’ve done a release. There have been odd setbacks here and there but Hazel 2.3 is out at last.

For those that share your machine with others, you’ll find that the App Sweep feature now allows everyone on a machine to have their support files thrown away when someone throws away an app. Everyone that wants to participate has to enable the feature (look in the “Trash” pane). I would have made this not an option but I had visions of people complaining about others being able to see what apps they are throwing away. So, now there’s a checkbox which personally I’d rather not have.

The feature I’m most excited about is, of course, the one that most of my users probably won’t care about or notice. But, this being a developer blog, I’m sure some of you would be interested. In version 2.2, I added an embedded script editor. The AppleScript editor had syntax highlighting because, well, Apple gives that to you. In 2.3, I’ve added syntax highlighting to the regular shell script editor. Of course, it’s not just for shell scripts. Just set the interpreter you want and if it’s one that Hazel knows about (currently, it’s bash, Perl, Python, Ruby and awk), then Hazel will color your code appropriately. Give it a spin and let me know what you think.

Oh, and I didn’t add any UI to configure the highlight colors. If you really hate the color scheme it uses, you can take your XCode color theme and copy/symbolically link it as ~/Library/Application Support/Hazel/Hazel.xccolortheme. I thought about making Hazel just use whatever is set in XCode but I got the feeling that people weren’t using XCode to edit their non-Objective-C stuff. I may change my mind on this in a future release. Feedback welcome.

And of course, there are a bunch of other new features, improvements, and fixes (and probably bugs).

As for the roadmap, there will definitely be another (free) update of some sort before 3.0. Snow Leopard is coming out in a couple months and I need to make Hazel compatible. If you are running Snow Leopard and would like to test, definitely drop me a line.

Comment » | Hazel, Noodlesoft, Software

Maintenance: Shady Characters

January 13th, 2009 — 5:44pm

As you may or may not have noticed (more likely the latter), this blog was down for a chunk of the afternoon. I had to fix something, and, well, it took a bit longer than usual. You may have noticed that you’d see garbage characters like “ö” pop up in posts and comments. That’s because some time ago a WordPress upgrade changed the character encodings. I didn’t consider it a high priority issue and let it sit until now.

Following this article, I converted everything over only to realize that none of the actual characters were converted properly. Instead of trying to debug SQL scripts that could potentially destroy all my data, I went through and edited every character encoding screw-up by hand. It wasn’t so bad with my posts since I pretty much remember what I put in there. Fixing user comments was a different matter. Being on a perfectionist tear, I used the Wayback Machine to find the comments before I performed the fateful WP upgrade just to figure out if somebody used a smart quote or an em-dash. Fun.

Hopefully everything is back up and fixed. If you notice any other garbage characters floating around, please post here so I can fix it.

And yes, I’m overdue for a real post. All you have to do is ÃâπÀìâ,öå¢Ã,Å,ìãâπÃ∫, and I just might be compelled to write something.

1 comment » | Noodlesoft, System Administration, Web

Hazel 2.2

July 7th, 2008 — 3:04pm

Yes, it’s finally out. Hazel 2.2 is what I consider the “power user” release. It adds advanced features such as pattern matching and custom tokens (basically, a more accessible form of regular expression matching and substitution, for you programmer types out there), inline scripts and ways for AppleScripts to control the rule flow. There are a bunch of smaller things tucked away in there, some of them subtle in their own ways. Make sure to read the release notes.

Thanks to all the beta testers who found all the bugs there were to find (you guys did find them all, right?) and all the users who have sent in the great comments that motivate me to keep working on this thing. Download it and give it a spin.

As for the future, I’m thinking of 3.0 though I’m not sure what will be in it yet or when it will happen. I also have been mulling over other projects so we’ll see. In the meantime, I look forward to your comments.

Comment » | Hazel, Noodlesoft, Software

On Software Bundles

June 17th, 2008 — 6:01pm

It occurred to me that it’s been about a month since I did the MacUpdate bundle in April. Now that things have settled down I figured I’d share my experiences with it.

Now, there has been some controversy concerning the bundles, boiling down to whether it is a good deal for the developers. After all this, I can’t say that the issue has been fully resolved in my mind but I’ll try to at least clarify the real issues at stake. I want this to be useful to other devs who are considering participating in bundle promotions without resorting to any demagoguery.

Why Did I Do it?

Hazel was included in the bundle with 9 other apps, the main one being Parallels. This was the anchor app that would be the big draw for most users. For me, this was a key thing. Not so much because of the potential sales as much as being associated with some larger name apps. Some people may have considered the bundle a bit boring as a lot of the apps were a bit “mainstream.” But then again, we’re talking apps that you actually see on the shelf in a store. It’s a whole level of distribution and exposure than online. What many people online don’t realize is that a vast segment of the potential user base does not scour the net for software reviews. They’ve never heard of any of your favorite Mac sites. They don’t know and don’t care about the latest Mac scandals, memes and fads. They go buy their software at an Apple store, or maybe on Amazon. Our only chance to get noticed by these users is in the oddball case when they click on that “Mac OS X Software” item in the Apple menu. The point is that for us smaller ISVs without a physical boxed product, it’s an untapped market for us. So, to be able to be associated with a couple apps from that “realm” I felt was an opportunity.

MacUpdate did run full-page spreads in MacWorld and MacLife, not something I would have been able to do myself. There is something nice about seeing your icon next to some bigger names in print. I don’t know how effective they were. The problem with print, of course, is that it’s hard to track. But again, I felt that the association would be helpful.

Now, I’m not going to give specific details concerning the money but I will say that it was a percentage-type deal. The more copies sold, the more money I got. Contrast this with a flat amount that does not vary no matter how well it sells. That said, the amount I got per bundle is way below what my product costs. So why do it? Some reasons:

  1. Volume. They will sell over an order of magnitude more copies than you will during that time period. The hope is that the volume makes up for the huge discount. The hope is more money in total.
  2. Not everyone is buying the bundle for your app. Especially if you are one of the smaller fish, you are probably piggybacking on the anchor app. One way to look at it is that you are getting part of someone else’s sale.
  3. Exposure. Yes, that nebulous thing that is bandied about. It’s hard to make any concrete claims on this one so I think it’s best to not base your decision on this factor alone. You hope your product gets more recognition in the long run but it’s hard to measure that.
  4. Userbase. By building up a large userbase, you have more people to get upgrade revenue from when the next big version comes out. Not having done a paid upgrade yet, I don’t know if this is all that it’s cracked up to be. Anyone with firsthand experience with this is invited to comment.

And of course, what’s bad about doing it?

  1. Cheapening your software. The notion here is that if you are selling your software at rock-bottom prices, people get the perception that it is not worth much. I feel this is valid but I also don’t think doing it every now and then is a big problem. I think the issue is if your product is sold at a discount often enough that people will start to expect it, waiting for the next promo to buy it. Like exposure, it is hard to quantify and so I have a hard time basing any argument on this alone.
  2. Support. Yes, taking on thousands of new customers in a short amount of time will probably result in an increased support load.
  3. Allowing promoters to exploit you. This is more of an ego/sense of justice issue. Fact is, these bundles are pulling in a lot of money. It is unclear whether the developers are getting a big enough slice of that pie. No one likes to be ripped off.

What Happened?

How did it go? Well, the bundle sold 15K copies. From what I can tell, that seems ok. Part of me expected more considering that a big name app (Parallels) was anchoring the thing. Also, it seemed like the unlocking thresholds backfired resulting in lags in the sales rate at certain points in the promotion. Personally, I’m not big on gimmicks but I leave the promotion to the promoters. I did sense a general fatigue amongst consumers with these bundles, though.

As far as the money issue goes, I got a decent chunk. If you look at it solely from a per-copy basis, then yes, it sucked. But the way I look at it is this: My revenue per month is at some amount A. I sell in a burst and rake in something like 3-4x A. Afterwards, revenue goes back to A. Now the last bit is important as it implies, to me, that I didn’t cannibalize (i.e. sold at a discount to a lot of people that would have purchased it anyways at full price) or otherwise negatively impact sales.

Now, while my sales were fine after the promotion, they didn’t shoot up (as some people may expect). This would seem to indicate the lack of effectiveness of the “exposure” element. It’s only been a month so we’ll see how it goes but at the moment, it’s like it never happened.

The question here now is what was lost. I’ll start with the more tangible cost which is support. Now, I had to deal with a support nightmare because the integration of my licensing with MacUpdate was less than ideal. I had to deal with a ton of emails with getting the program registered. Now, I’ll admit my licensing scheme was the odd-man out but I don’t get these issues with my own store. So, in this instance, the support cost to me was a bit high. That said, it was very annoying because I felt it could have been easily prevented or rectified. Outside of the registration snafu, support was not too bad. A moderate burst during the promotion and that’s it.

The other thing to consider is opportunity cost. This is the cannibalization I referred to earlier. Were you losing money to people that would have bought at full price? It’s not a question that can be definitively answered but as I mentioned, I use sales after the promotion as a gauge for this type of thing. If there’s a sales dip right afterwards, that implies to me that a lot of people that were going to buy your product anyways bought earlier to get the deal. In my case, sales were not negatively affected so I do not consider it a significant issue in this case.

Was It Worth It and Will I Do It Again?

I’d say it was worth it, but not in the way people would expect. It was worth it to me in that I got a nice check afterwards without having my sales adversely affected. As for exposure, there may be better ways to get people to know about your app without practically giving it to them. I don’t have a paid upgrade planned out yet so that was not even a consideration for me. For me to do it again, I think I would have to be offered a good deal, percentage-wise. My sense is that these promotions are more effective in the short term than long term.

Now, that doesn’t mean that it is totally ineffective in creating exposure for your app. I have seen signs that people have been turned on to Hazel who had never heard of it before. The issue here is that it has not translated into increased sales (at least so far). Maybe it will help in the long term but since it’s near impossible to quantify, it’s not a prime motivation for me when doing these types of promotions.

Did I Get Ripped Off?

To address the big controversy, no, I do not think I was ripped off though I could’ve done better. Let me start off by saying that I feel that promoters do provide a valuable service. I’ve seen some developers band together with their own bundles with less than stellar results. Fact is, not anyone can just throw their stuff up and expect to sell any large volume. There is skill and work involved in getting people’s attention. Doing it yourself is, well, just doing it yourself. If you already have the pull to get tons of people to pay attention to you, then you probably don’t need to do special promotions for your apps.

Now, I haven’t seen the books for any of these promotions plus the deals probably vary greatly depending on who does them so it may be unfair to lump them all together. But it seems to me that the promoters are getting quite a large chunk and that they can afford to cut the devs a better deal. I’ve seen arguments along the lines of “How can you criticize them? They are getting sales for developers/exposure for their software/donating money to charity/yadda yadda.” This is a logical fallacy. Yes, maybe they are doing some good things, but that doesn’t mean it justifies the bad things. There is nothing that has indicated to me that they can’t do all the good things they already do while providing a more equitable split. Again, I haven’t seen the books but my sense is that there is some leeway there.

I want to make it clear, though, that I have no complaints about my deal with MacUpdate. In the end, it was my deal to negotiate. For me, this was an experiment and knowing what I do now will help in assessing future promotions.

And of course, this is just my experience and your mileage may vary. Especially if you are just starting out, it’s possible the exposure element will be more helpful. I’m not sure how useful the exposure is for the more well-known apps but I suspect that they, having more leverage, negotiated higher percentages. In the end, you have to assess whether it fits with where you and your app are, marketwise.

32 comments » | Hazel, Noodlesoft, Software

Hazel 2.2 beta available for testing

May 29th, 2008 — 1:33pm

This past month I’ve finally gotten some time focus on development and it’s paid off. Hazel 2.2 beta is out. Go to the forums (signup required) for details on how to get it.

The big feature is pattern based matching and substitution. It’s regular expressions for regular people. I still consider it somewhat of a power-user feature but I think I’ve managed to make it accessible to non-programmers. I know some of the programmer-types out there wanted regexes but, really, life is too short for people to have to decipher something like ^(.*)\(\p{N}+\)\.(?:\p{L}|\p{N})+$.

Other features include being able to edit/include AppleScripts and shell scripts inline. This will allow for self-contained rule sets that you can distribute. More date matching operators especially geared towards GTD-like workflows. A couple other more subtle things here and there.

But most of all, this is a momentous occasion because I have finally done it. I have fixed bug #1 in my bug database. Entered almost two years ago, it kept getting carried over to each release’s bug list time and time again. What is bug #1, you may ask? Why, it’s none other than “multiple selection in the rule list”. It’s been one of those rarely requested (maybe 2 or 3 people since Hazel’s original release), low-priority bugs that kept getting overlooked. Well, no longer. I went in and fixed it once and for all (hopefully). Now it looks like bug #4 is the next oldest bug, which, at this rate, I should have closed out in a couple years.

So, if you are fine with running unstable pre-release software that then I invite you to kick the tires. All I ask that you keep all details of the beta to the forums or in emails to me.

1 comment » | Hazel, Noodlesoft

Sponsoring Daring Fireball

May 27th, 2008 — 10:10am

Some months ago I had arranged to sponsor Daring Fireball for sometime in April. Then a certain promotion came up that overlapped with it. Not being big on overlapping promotions I bumped it until later. Then I bumped it again. Then another bump. Then a jump to the left and a step to the…whoops, wrong card.

But this week, finally, I am sponsoring Daring Fireball’s RSS feed. There’s even a promo coupon. I’m not going to tell you what it is as that would defeat the purpose of the promotion. Subscribe to the feed and look for yourself. If it’s not showing up for you, wait towards the end of the week when it will get posted again.

And on a side note, I suggest hanging around the forums (signup required for the beta forum in particular) as there may be some beta news by the end of the week.

Comment » | Hazel, Noodlesoft, Web

MacUpdate Bundle

April 16th, 2008 — 3:53pm

If you haven’t seen the ads or announcements yet, Hazel is in the MacUpdate bundle that starts today. 10 great apps for $65.

Bundle mates include:

Parallels Desktop
Banner Zest
Sound Studio
DVD Remaster
Typinator
StoryMill
Leap
MenuCalendarClock
Art Text

This is the first bundle I’ve been a part of so I’m not sure what to expect. I’ve beefed up the server so hopefully the site will stay responsive throughout the promotion. When it’s all said and done, I’ll post my thoughts on participating. In the meantime, grab it while it’s hot.

1 comment » | Hazel, Noodlesoft

Back to top