Here is the starting situation:
Note that the <•Suffix> token is not used in the action! The <•Suffix> token contains the pattern <...> and the goal was to replace it with just that pattern. It is a cleanup because the token value is not used anywhere and would make the rule easier to read.
So, open the pattern and select the token:
Now hitting "Delete" results in:
Note that, somehow, Hazel seems to think I am dealing with the token to the left of it, and that one is indeed used in an action below.
Subsequently clicking on "Delete" results in this:
The <•Suffix> token was indeed removed from the condition I was editing, but the other token <•Date From Prefix> was removed from the condition before and after, but not from the condition I was editing. It was also removed from the action. This is particularly annoying because the other two occurrences of <•Date From Prefix> contain different patterns that are also subsequently lost.
Although the issue can be avoided by first removing the <•Date From Prefix> token from the action, then deleting the <•Suffix> token (no warnings or problems this way), and then reinstitution of the token in the action, I consider this a bug.
Related, but separate I could see an improvement where merely deleting a token elsewhere (in those scenarios where that would actually be correct), allowing the warning to have two choices:
- Delete token, but replace with its pattern
- Delete token and its pattern
This (choosing the first alternative) would at least preserve what each condition was matching, reducing the odds unexpected side effects of such an edit.