<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby on Rails: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>On Mac OS X programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:25:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15921</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15921</guid>
		<description>Maybe check out http://heroku.com for Potion Store deployment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe check out <a href="http://heroku.com" rel="nofollow">http://heroku.com</a> for Potion Store deployment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_noodle</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15625</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_noodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15625</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments. As for the language, I have a strong distaste for Perl so anything that strives to emulate its syntax lowers my respect for it. Ruby&#039;s syntax is not so bad that I want to gouge my eyes out but I do find it hard to decipher at times (at least harder than it has to be). Yes, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get used to it but, by contrast, I&#039;ve only written like two Python scripts in my life and I can probably decipher Python code easier than a Ruby one on first glance.

There are a lot of great things in the language but I feel that it stumbled on syntax. While I can appreciate all the cool things underneath, I still have to read and write the code.

Oh, and does it seem odd that Ruby doesn&#039;t have decent built-in Unicode support? Given that the creator is Japanese, you&#039;d think that Unicode would have been a higher priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments. As for the language, I have a strong distaste for Perl so anything that strives to emulate its syntax lowers my respect for it. Ruby&#8217;s syntax is not so bad that I want to gouge my eyes out but I do find it hard to decipher at times (at least harder than it has to be). Yes, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get used to it but, by contrast, I&#8217;ve only written like two Python scripts in my life and I can probably decipher Python code easier than a Ruby one on first glance.</p>
<p>There are a lot of great things in the language but I feel that it stumbled on syntax. While I can appreciate all the cool things underneath, I still have to read and write the code.</p>
<p>Oh, and does it seem odd that Ruby doesn&#8217;t have decent built-in Unicode support? Given that the creator is Japanese, you&#8217;d think that Unicode would have been a higher priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15573</link>
		<dc:creator>kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15573</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you... the main thing I noticed about RoR is that it&#039;s great, but deployment on a production server totally SUCKS... Especially without cap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you&#8230; the main thing I noticed about RoR is that it&#8217;s great, but deployment on a production server totally SUCKS&#8230; Especially without cap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joachim Bengtsson</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15570</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim Bengtsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15570</guid>
		<description>Like archie4oz, I&#039;d definitely say,
Ruby: oh sweet goodness! Is there anything more beautiful?
Rails: Meh. Immature even after a few years of mega-hype.

I like a lot of the thinking in Rails (convention over configuration, e g), but the implementation is severely lacking. Single-threaded? Triple-ouch. And deployment is always a pain.

The book is great though, as you say, also as an intro to Ruby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like archie4oz, I&#8217;d definitely say,<br />
Ruby: oh sweet goodness! Is there anything more beautiful?<br />
Rails: Meh. Immature even after a few years of mega-hype.</p>
<p>I like a lot of the thinking in Rails (convention over configuration, e g), but the implementation is severely lacking. Single-threaded? Triple-ouch. And deployment is always a pain.</p>
<p>The book is great though, as you say, also as an intro to Ruby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manton Reece</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15556</link>
		<dc:creator>Manton Reece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15556</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing up your experience. A lot of people come to Ruby because of Rails and end up falling in love with the language, but I&#039;m probably not one of those people either. I love the clean syntax and power that comes with how dynamic it is though.

I&#039;d like to believe that one day the deployment issues will be sorted out, but it&#039;s a hard problem to solve because of how Rails was designed. Maybe one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing up your experience. A lot of people come to Ruby because of Rails and end up falling in love with the language, but I&#8217;m probably not one of those people either. I love the clean syntax and power that comes with how dynamic it is though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to believe that one day the deployment issues will be sorted out, but it&#8217;s a hard problem to solve because of how Rails was designed. Maybe one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archie4oz</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-15553</link>
		<dc:creator>archie4oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15553</guid>
		<description>Personally I think you got it backwards (Rails: meh, Ruby: Great), but that&#039;s just my opinion.  Merb addresses my gripes w/Rails, alas it would probably be more work that it&#039;s worth to migrate Potion Store running on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think you got it backwards (Rails: meh, Ruby: Great), but that&#8217;s just my opinion.  Merb addresses my gripes w/Rails, alas it would probably be more work that it&#8217;s worth to migrate Potion Store running on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
