<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby on Rails: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>On Mac OS X programming</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15921</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15921</guid>
		<description>Maybe check out http://heroku.com for Potion Store deployment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe check out <a href="http://heroku.com" rel="nofollow">http://heroku.com</a> for Potion Store deployment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_noodle</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15625</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_noodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15625</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments. As for the language, I have a strong distaste for Perl so anything that strives to emulate its syntax lowers my respect for it. Ruby's syntax is not so bad that I want to gouge my eyes out but I do find it hard to decipher at times (at least harder than it has to be). Yes, I'm sure I'll get used to it but, by contrast, I've only written like two Python scripts in my life and I can probably decipher Python code easier than a Ruby one on first glance.

There are a lot of great things in the language but I feel that it stumbled on syntax. While I can appreciate all the cool things underneath, I still have to read and write the code.

Oh, and does it seem odd that Ruby doesn't have decent built-in Unicode support? Given that the creator is Japanese, you'd think that Unicode would have been a higher priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments. As for the language, I have a strong distaste for Perl so anything that strives to emulate its syntax lowers my respect for it. Ruby&#8217;s syntax is not so bad that I want to gouge my eyes out but I do find it hard to decipher at times (at least harder than it has to be). Yes, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get used to it but, by contrast, I&#8217;ve only written like two Python scripts in my life and I can probably decipher Python code easier than a Ruby one on first glance.</p>
<p>There are a lot of great things in the language but I feel that it stumbled on syntax. While I can appreciate all the cool things underneath, I still have to read and write the code.</p>
<p>Oh, and does it seem odd that Ruby doesn&#8217;t have decent built-in Unicode support? Given that the creator is Japanese, you&#8217;d think that Unicode would have been a higher priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15573</link>
		<dc:creator>kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15573</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you... the main thing I noticed about RoR is that it's great, but deployment on a production server totally SUCKS... Especially without cap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you&#8230; the main thing I noticed about RoR is that it&#8217;s great, but deployment on a production server totally SUCKS&#8230; Especially without cap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joachim Bengtsson</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15570</link>
		<dc:creator>Joachim Bengtsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15570</guid>
		<description>Like archie4oz, I'd definitely say,
Ruby: oh sweet goodness! Is there anything more beautiful?
Rails: Meh. Immature even after a few years of mega-hype.

I like a lot of the thinking in Rails (convention over configuration, e g), but the implementation is severely lacking. Single-threaded? Triple-ouch. And deployment is always a pain.

The book is great though, as you say, also as an intro to Ruby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like archie4oz, I&#8217;d definitely say,<br />
Ruby: oh sweet goodness! Is there anything more beautiful?<br />
Rails: Meh. Immature even after a few years of mega-hype.</p>
<p>I like a lot of the thinking in Rails (convention over configuration, e g), but the implementation is severely lacking. Single-threaded? Triple-ouch. And deployment is always a pain.</p>
<p>The book is great though, as you say, also as an intro to Ruby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manton Reece</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15556</link>
		<dc:creator>Manton Reece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15556</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing up your experience. A lot of people come to Ruby because of Rails and end up falling in love with the language, but I'm probably not one of those people either. I love the clean syntax and power that comes with how dynamic it is though.

I'd like to believe that one day the deployment issues will be sorted out, but it's a hard problem to solve because of how Rails was designed. Maybe one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing up your experience. A lot of people come to Ruby because of Rails and end up falling in love with the language, but I&#8217;m probably not one of those people either. I love the clean syntax and power that comes with how dynamic it is though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to believe that one day the deployment issues will be sorted out, but it&#8217;s a hard problem to solve because of how Rails was designed. Maybe one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archie4oz</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15553</link>
		<dc:creator>archie4oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2008/03/31/ruby-on-rails-first-impressions/#comment-15553</guid>
		<description>Personally I think you got it backwards (Rails: meh, Ruby: Great), but that's just my opinion.  Merb addresses my gripes w/Rails, alas it would probably be more work that it's worth to migrate Potion Store running on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think you got it backwards (Rails: meh, Ruby: Great), but that&#8217;s just my opinion.  Merb addresses my gripes w/Rails, alas it would probably be more work that it&#8217;s worth to migrate Potion Store running on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
