<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWDC midweek report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/</link>
	<description>On Mac OS X programming</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mr_noodle</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_noodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>Tim: Re: validation: AFAIK, it's some Wordpress thing. Not sure if where to fix that but I'll poke around.

Jon: I don't have a two screen setup (yet) but I always imagined that mousing around would be a pain in the ass. I always thought that making the menubar appear on the window where your mouse is would be an interesting hack for someone to do. Basically, a "focus follows mouse" for the menubar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: Re: validation: AFAIK, it&#8217;s some Wordpress thing. Not sure if where to fix that but I&#8217;ll poke around.</p>
<p>Jon: I don&#8217;t have a two screen setup (yet) but I always imagined that mousing around would be a pain in the ass. I always thought that making the menubar appear on the window where your mouse is would be an interesting hack for someone to do. Basically, a &#8220;focus follows mouse&#8221; for the menubar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>I'm also not crazy about the menubar. Seems like it'd be hard to read. Also, it seems to be aping an aspect of the Vista UI which was criticized for that very reason.

What annoys me about the current menubar, is that when you have monitors arranged side by side, the menubar gets in the way when dragging a window from the secondary to the primary. And it's hard to arrange the monitors in the preferences so that the top of the secondary monitor is level with the bottom of the menubar on the primary.

What I'd really like is if each monitor could have its own menubar, and its own active application. So if you have Mail on the secondary monitor, you wouldn't have to mouse all the way back to the primary monitor every time you need to click on a menu. On two 30" monitors, that could be a very long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also not crazy about the menubar. Seems like it&#8217;d be hard to read. Also, it seems to be aping an aspect of the Vista UI which was criticized for that very reason.</p>
<p>What annoys me about the current menubar, is that when you have monitors arranged side by side, the menubar gets in the way when dragging a window from the secondary to the primary. And it&#8217;s hard to arrange the monitors in the preferences so that the top of the secondary monitor is level with the bottom of the menubar on the primary.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d really like is if each monitor could have its own menubar, and its own active application. So if you have Mail on the secondary monitor, you wouldn&#8217;t have to mouse all the way back to the primary monitor every time you need to click on a menu. On two 30&#8243; monitors, that could be a very long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noodlesoft.com/blog/2007/06/13/wwdc-midweek-report/#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>re: piechart

I think they were making the point that until they released Safari for Windows, they couldn't gobble up the part of the pie chart which represented IE, so the only thing they could do was compete against Firefox.  (Although given that most FF users are on Windows, that still couldn't compete until they put Safari on Windows...)

btw, your email validation thing doesn't seem to know about the ".name" top-level domain.  I had to enter a different email address than normal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: piechart</p>
<p>I think they were making the point that until they released Safari for Windows, they couldn&#8217;t gobble up the part of the pie chart which represented IE, so the only thing they could do was compete against Firefox.  (Although given that most FF users are on Windows, that still couldn&#8217;t compete until they put Safari on Windows&#8230;)</p>
<p>btw, your email validation thing doesn&#8217;t seem to know about the &#8220;.name&#8221; top-level domain.  I had to enter a different email address than normal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
